Crime

« Previous Entries

Bring Back The Firing Squad Pt 2

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

18 year old Ashley Clark was home alone, recovering from recent brain surgery, when the unthinkable happened.  Two teenagers, a 16 year old male and 17 year old female, broke into the house intending to steal the car belonging to the homeowner.

When they were unable to accomplish the theft, they found the disabled girl and decided to take out their frustrations on her.  They bound her, shaved her head, and beat her in the head with a baseball bat despite her pleas for them to stop because she recently had brain surgery.

These two wastes of air were found later that evening after they had left the scene, but Ashley had to be taken to the hospital where she’s expected to recover.

And watch, these two ‘misguided’ youths will be labled as victims.  People will support them as they do every other scumbag in the world.  I read blogs and posts all the time written by people who say that whatever psycho is being discussed was just a ‘lonley, lost soul who just needed a little love.’

You know what I say to those people?  I tell them they need to be sentenced right along with the buttplugs they’re supporting.

These two kids weren’t just ‘misguided’ - they were sick.  Pure fucking evil.  No ‘human’ being would repeatedly beat on a disabled person who had just undergone brain surgery.  No ‘human’ would beat on a disabled person to begin with.  Any person who would do this is a lost cause and should be put away for life. 

 Here, read the article:

Teens Target Disabled Girl in Brutal Home Invasion 


Yet Another Reason I’m For The Death Penalty

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

Take the case of Tracy Hermann and James Sargent of Peoria, Illinois. Their 5-month old son, Benjamin, was dropped off a their home strapped in his car seat. 8 days later, he was still in said car seat, on the living room floor, dead of starvation and neglect.

What was the reason for the neglect? Apparently Mom and Dad were too busy eating and playing video games to take care of their child.

Seriously, for 8 days this baby was strapped in a car seat, in a crib.

Sargent even admitted that he probably never even moved the kid for those 8 days. They just left him in his car seat to starve to death.

I say bring back the firing squad.


You Don’t Know Jack…..

Friday, January 18th, 2008

….but you should.  Jack McLellan is a self-admitted pedophile working his evil in California and Washington state.

Jack was recently featured twice on ‘The Steve Wilkos Show’ admitting to the world that he was sexually attracted to children.  Apparently he’s admitted it publicly in other forums as well, not metely on ‘Steve’ because he has his own website which guides peophiles to places where they can easily find children.  He even rates these places by how attractive the children are that can be found there.

Yet he claims he’s never done anything illegal.  The ‘worst’ he’s done is to lure children away from their parents and give them ‘hugs.’

McLellan is still operating his website.  I’ll post the link to it here as soon as I can find it.  Never having trolled the internet for sites relating to pedophilia, I really don’t know where to look.  Wilkos actually asked the question as to what kind of a person would want to visit his site.  I give Steve this answer:  Any person who wants to protect children.   One way of beating the pedophiles is to know where they operate and how they do it.  By knowing which places McLellan is promoting, we can know to be extra careful when in those places.

McLellan also argues that having this website isn’t violating any laws since he’s not directly promoting the molestation of children.  Wilkos asked him about this as well, stating that if something illegal was done to a child based on information gotten through his website, he is partly responsible and should be held as an accomplice.

I agree.

I think Jack McLellan should be locked up.  He’s already a ‘person of interest’ in the murder of a young girl at one of the locations that his website promotes.  He also refused to submit to a DNA test at the Wilkos show to clear his name.  What does that tell you?  The way he was fidgeting around onstage made him look guilty in my eyes.

Here’s an interview done with McLellan:


Oh, Those Dangerous MySpaces!

Wednesday, January 16th, 2008

The bigwigs at MySpace have finally decided to cave into the pressure being put on them by idiot parents and try to ‘protect’ its younger users from the threats that sicko pedophiles pose on the website.

 That’s all well and good, but some of the ideas they have, and are going to put into place, really won’t work.  They just aren’t practical.

Although this is my opinion, I’ve been discovering in my travels around the interwebs that this opinion is shared with bloggers from all corners of the globe.   Here’s the gist of what they want to do: 

1.) Set all profiles of 15-and-under users to private, and prevent those profiles from getting any sort of communication from any adult they do now know.

2.) Default all 16 and 17-year-old users’ profiles to private, which they can change to public if they so wish.

3.) Deny any registered sex offenders access to the site.

 While all of those are pretty good ideas, how does MySpace propose to enforce them?  Any 13-year-old can go on there and create a profile with the britdate set to 1982.  It’s not difficult.

Also, suppose Joe Smith the Molester wants a profile on MySpace but he’s a registered sex offender.  How does he get around that?  Easily, by signing up as Bobby Jones, the nice guy from Detroit. 

MySpace should be thanked for the effort, but politely told that none of this is going to work.

 What would work, on the other hand, is better parenting.  I’m so sick of hearing parents declare to the media that their child was raped or put in danger because of MySpace or some other internet bases social network.   I ask you this, parents: Where were you while your child was chatting it up with Chester the Molester online?    Why are you not monitoring your minor’s internet activity, when you hear every day about a child who falls prey to some online predator?  WHy are you not protecting your child?

 It’s sad to say, but I truly believe that a lot of these “parents” are hoping their child will get injured due to a MySpace rendezvous so that they can try to sue.

’nuff said.


Guilty!

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

Damien Echols sits on death row, waiting for justice.

 In 1993, he and two other teenage boys in the town of West Memphis, Arkansas were arrested, tried and convicted for the murder of three young boys.

 It was said the murders were part of a satanic ritual, performed by the boys known nowadays as the West Memphis Three.  They were satanists because they had long hair and listened to Metallica. 

 The trial was a joke.  The conviction was an even bigger joke, only not a funny one.

 You can read all about them at www.wm3.org, or watch the film Paradise Lost.  I’m not here to talk about them.  I’m here to talk about another case that’s been in the news recently that has quite a few things in common with the three boys from West Memphis.

The victim’s name is Stacy Peterson, the suspect her husband Drew.

I’ll say it right off:  I don’t like Drew Peterson.  I don’t like the attitude he seems to have, nor the fact that he doesn’t seem to care about the welfare of his missing wife.  It wouldn’t surprise me if he did, in fact, murder her.

See what I did there?  I implied that he may have killed his wife by making a statement to which a lot of people would argue I’ve already tried and convicted him in my mind.

Which is exactly what the media has done to this man.  Every news story has basically come out and said he killed her.  He’s been tried and convicted before even being arrested, or before it’s even been proven that his young wife is dead.

Sure, it’s been proven by one of the top medical examiners in the nation that his previous wife, Kathleen Savio, was murdered in her bathtub.  It was never proven, however, that Peterson killed her.

The problem that’s being created here by the sensationalism of this news story is that our justice system now can’t possibly provide a fair trial for this man if he is indeed arrested.  The court system would be hard pressed to find someone who hasn’t been following this story and who hasn’t already formed an opinion of Drew Peterson.

This is the same thing that happened in West Memphis.  The town had already tried and convicted these three boys, and thus the prosecution needed no physical evidence lock in a guilty verdict.  The same thing is going to happen to Drew Peterson if he goes on trial.

We see this investigation every day in the news, but is Peterson the only lead the police are following?  The only suspect?  If so,  they should arrest him.  If there’s any doubt, they should be finding other avenues to pursue and say so.  If Peterson can be all over the news, so should any other lead that the police are following.  That’s the only ay this horrible journalism can be made unbiased.

I’ll be interested to see how all of this unfolds.

 Any opinions?


« Previous Entries